Showing posts with label Strategic Decisions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Strategic Decisions. Show all posts

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Assessing, Positioning and Deciding




Click on this link for an interesting article on how people analyzed complex business problems with the attitude of overconfidence and over-simplified solutions.


Compass Rule:
  • Assess the Big Tangible Picture before deciding.

There is always a trade-off and sometimes an unseen blow back for some major decisions. Some-one (or some group) usually gets penalized.

Talk show hosts, lawyers and politicians usually enjoyed the act of selling the message of "a Win and Win situation" or "We will all live happily ever after, because of that decision. ..." 

The masses buy it because they want a simple outcome and do not want to think more about it. It is always easy to sell the obvious message of "easy" risk benefit while hiding the truth of risk consequences.

Some of these people prefer to be focused on the positives, without ever focusing on the tradeoffs and the negative consequences. In public, their idea of deep thinking is contemplating on which of the three choices would be benefit them now.


The professionals focus on those points and then re-assesses which of the three choices are for real and what are the possible risk consequences.


Base Approach

  1. Collect relevant data relating to to your Big Tangible Picture.
  2. Pinpoint the positive points and the negative points from various different angles.
  3. Identify the risk benefits and and the risk consequences of each point
  4. Determine whether the settings behind the goal is predictable or unpredictable.
  5. Adjust your goal accordingly.
Proper assessment of the targeted settings usually enables one to determine the comprehension of the advantages and disadvantages.


Playing the Cyclical game
Some decision making process is similar to the game of dices. Everyone who plays the game, know that the current shooter will "crap" out (hit the seven) before making their mark sooner or later. When one has properly assessed that the possibility of crapping out becomes obvious. Then, it is time to bet against the shooter. ...

Did you know the smart and experienced players usually generate more cash, betting against the shooter than for the shooter? (It is quite similar to various future speculation schemes That is another subject matter).

In any economic situation, the smart strategic thinkers know that nothing stays the same. For every peak, there is a valley. They know when to exit before the game is over.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Lessons from the Life of Zhang Liang (2)


(updated in 03.12.2015)
This picture is from Oriental Treasures

Zhang Liang is one of our favorite examples of the professional strategists who failed early and made successful comebacks. He resided between the final period of the Qin dynasty (221 to 206 BCE ) and the earlier years of the Han dynasty (206 BCE to 220 CE).



Some of his many strategic trademarks were:
  • Strategizing the multiple threads of different operations into one's Big Tangible Picture;
  • Thinking in completeness; 
  • Understanding the grand connective concept of civil fundamentals; martial fundamentals; leadership; tactical essentials and tactical specifics.
  • Understanding the concept of conspiring to collaborate;
  • Gaining cooperation and collaboration from a diversity of principals; and 
  • Controlling any strategic operation from many thousands miles away.
#

Following is some more historical data on Zhang Liang's life:

Meeting Huang Shigong
As a wanted man by the government, Zhang travelled to Xiapi and stayed there for some time, using fake identities to evade the authorities. One day, Zhang took a stroll at the Yishui Bridge and met an old man there. The man walked towards Zhang and chucked his shoe down the bridge on purpose, after which he yelled at Zhang, "Hey boy, go down and fetch me my shoe!" Zhang was astonished and unhappy but obeyed silently. The old man then lifted his foot and ordered Zhang to put on the shoe for him. Zhang was furious but he controlled his temper and meekly obliged. The man did not show any sign of gratitude and walked away laughing.
The old man came back after walking a distance and praised Zhang, "This child can be taught!"[2] and asked Zhang to meet him at the bridge again at dawn five days later. Zhang was confused but agreed. Five days later, Zhang rushed to the bridge at the stroke of dawn but the old man was already waiting for him there. The old man chided him, "How can you be late for a meeting with an elderly man? Come back again five days later!" Zhang tried his best to be punctual the second time but the old man still arrived earlier than him, and he was scorned by the old man once more and told to return again five days later. The third time, Zhang went to the bridge at midnight and waited until the old man appeared. This time, the old man was impressed with Zhang's fortitude and humility, that he presented Zhang with a book, saying, "You can become the tutor of a ruler after reading this book. Within ten years, the world will become chaotic. You can then use your knowledge from this book to bring peace and prosperity to the empire. Meet me again 13 years later. I'm the yellow rock at the foot of Mount Gucheng."

The old man was Huang Shigong (黃石公; literally: "Yellow Rock Old Man") of the legendary "Four Haos of Mount Shang" (商山四皓), a group of four reclusive wise men. The book was titled The Art of War by Taigong (太公兵法) and believed to be the Six Secret Teachings by Jiang Ziya, while some called it Three Strategies of Huang Shigong. In legend, Zhang returned to the indicated site 13 years and did see a yellow rock there. He built a shrine to worship the rock and the rock was buried with him after his death.

Reflection Points
The two lessons that the reader can learned from this Zhang Liang's experience are:
  • the importance of pre-positioning (projecting, planning and preparation) before a significant event; and
  • the cause of every personal action can be assessed in terms of fortitude and humility.

After extensively study of the Six Secret Teachings essay and other strategic classics, Zhang Liang learned the importance of knowing and understanding the Big Tangible Picture (BTP) and later became the principal strategic advisor for Liu Bang, the future emperor of the Han Dynasty.

Zhang Liang continuously made quality strategic decisions and was an excellent collaborator with the other strategic advisors of Liu Bang. He always credited the people who presented valid ideas to the Liu Bang's court.

We will discussed more about the life of Zhang Liang, the Six Secret Teachings and his strategic decision management process in our future posts

Click here and here for more historical notes on the life of Zhang Liang.


# # #

Sunday, February 27, 2011

The Challenge of Assessing Strategically


Introduction

How do people usually assess the "Big Tangible Picture?" The majority either assess it by observation or by concepts and principles. The rest prefer to assess by data. In our future book, we will cover the topic of assessing by data.

Do you ever think that the majority ever assess the "Big Tangible Picture" in terms of risk, uncertainty and volatility?


How the Compass Assessment Process Works

You don't know what you don't know
You can't do what you don't know
You don't know until you measure
You don't measure what you don't value
You don't value what you don't measure
- Six Sigma


We begin the strategic assessment session by asking some of the following questions:
  • What is your conceptualization of the "Big Tangible Picture?"
  • How do you usually assess the "Big Tangible Picture?"
  • Do you start by understanding your end in mind?
  • Do you know what your values are?
  • Do you know how to measure your values?
  • Do you ever think what is your main competition up to?
  • In competitive situation, do you think you can transform your assessed data into a strategic power?

Summary
The quality of strategic assessment is totally irrelevant if the principal can't decide properly and promptly. We will talk more about strategic decision making in a later post.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

The Importance of Timing (The Attribute of Strategic Power)




The Essence of Strategic Power

Strategic Power is the outcome that originates from one's own comprehension and the execution of the following strategic attributes of surprise, momentum and timing. When someone has strategic power, he or she can time his action to the seasonal cycles of their competitive terrain and the competitors within it. (We will discuss this intricate process in one of our future books.)

"The Sage takes his signs from the movements of Heaven and Earth; who knows its principles. He accords with the Tao of yin and yang, serves the movement of the sun and the moon and follows their seasonal activity. He follows their cycles of fullness and emptiness day and night, taken them as his constant. All things have life and death in accord with the forms of Heaven and Earth. Thus it is said that if one fights before understanding the situation, even if he is more numerous, he will certainly be defeated. ...
One who excels at warfare will await events in the situation without making any movement. When he sees he can be victorious, he will arise; if he sees he cannot be victorious, he will desist. Thus it is said that he does not have any fear, he does desist. Thus, it is said that one fights before seeing the situation, even if he is not vacillate. Of the many harms that can beset an army, vacillation is the greatest. Of disasters that can befall an army, none surpasses doubt."
- Jiang Tai Gong (Dr. Sawyer's translation of the Six Secret Teachings)


Click here on the state of Steve Jobs.

More information on this story can be found at San Jose Mercury and The NY Times. Click here for Apple's latest stock price.

An associate sent us the following note, "Even in announcing his medical leave, Jobs was smart enough to make the announcement on a day when the market was closed, and the day before Apple would announce an increase of 78% in their earnings. ..."

Our View
Steve Jobs timed his actions with ease by assessing big tangible picture.  He comprehended the configuration of the market terrain in terms of the various levels and the various seasonal cycles.


Smart decision makers usually possess a strong understanding of the connections between the macro and micro timing cycles within their competitive terrain. This view of the big tangible picture usually reduces the "doubt" factor while enabling them to focus on the timing of their decision points. This understanding also enables one to create and drive events before the opposition is awake.

At this level of global competition, there is no such thing as coincidences. ... Get well, Steve! Your ideas and your products rock.



Click here for another example of strategic power.

To achieve strategic power, one must do the following:
  • Assess the big tangible picture;
  • Position themselves in a position of strategic power; and
  • Influence the necessary components with strategic power.

Summary
When one has strategic power, he or she can prevail over the competition. ... Do you have the strategic power to prevail?

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Lessons from the Life of Zhang Liang (1)


Zhang Liang is one of our favorite examples of professional strategists who failed early and made successful comebacks. He resided between the final period of the Qin dynasty (221 to 206 BCE ) and the earlier years of the Han dynasty (206 BCE to 220 CE).

Three of his many strategic trademarks were:
  • Strategizing the threads of multiple operations into one Big Tangible Picture;
  • Controlling any strategic operation from many thousands miles away; and
  • Gaining cooperation and collaboration from a diversity of principals
Birth and origin of Zhang Liang
Zhang was born in Chengfu (present-day Chengfu Town, Bozhou, Anhui). He descended from an aristocrat family in the Hán state of the Warring States Period. His grandfather served three generations of the Hán rulers as chancellor while his father served two generations. Zhang missed the opportunity to inherit his family's legacy as the Hán state was annexed by the Qin state in 230 BC as part of Qin's wars of unification.


Assassination attempt on Qin Shi Huang

To avenge the fall of his native state, Zhang dedicated his efforts to hire assassins to kill Qin Shi Huang. He spent his entire family fortune and failed to give his deceased younger brother a proper funeral. He managed to find a man with great physical strength to help him, and had an iron hammer weighing 120 ancient catties (roughly 67 lbs. or 30 kg) forged for the strongman. In 218 BC, Zhang heard that Qin Shi Huang was going to Yangwu County (present-day eastern Yuanyang County, Henan) as part of his inspection tour, and was due to pass by Bolangsha during the journey.
Zhang and the strongman lay in ambush at Bolangsha and waited for the emperor's convoy to approach. Zhang saw that all the carriages that passed by were pulled by four horses[1] and believed that the most decorated one in the middle was the emperor's carriage. The strongman hurled the hammer towards it and the heavy projectile crushed the carriage, killing its occupant. Zhang fled from the scene during the ensuing chaos. Qin Shi Huang was actually not in that carriage and survived the assassination attempt, after which he issued an order for the arrest of Zhang. Zhang eluded the dragnet for ten days by using fake identities and became a fugitive.
Reflection Points
The two lessons that one can learned from Zhang Liang's misfortune are:
  • Zhang Liang should have possessed better intelligence before making a strategic decision;.
  • Zhang Liang should have carefully monitored this event from a safe remote site.
After extensively study of the Six Secret Teachings essay and other strategic classics, Zhang Liang learned the importance of the big tangible picture (btp) and later became the principal strategic advisor for Liu Bang, the future emperor of the Han Dynasty.

Zhang Liang continuously made quality strategic decisions and was an excellent collaborator with the other strategic advisors of Liu Bang. He always credited the people who presented valid ideas to the court of Liu Bang.

We will talk more about the life of Zhang Liang and the Six Secret Teachings in future posts.


The Foundation of Our Compass AE Process

The Grandness of a Grand Objective Sometimes Determines the Comprehensiveness of the Risk.
  • The scope of an objective usually determines the amount of difficulty and the extremity of the risk that a strategist would encounter.
The Completeness of the Information Determines the Risk and the Uncertainty of the Executed Intent.
  • The quantity of quality information determines the quantity of risk and uncertainty.
The Quality of Information Determines the Quality of the Strategic Decision
  • Regardless of the strategic venture, a good strategist should always maintain absolute control of the entire operation by constantly checking and reviewing the validity of the intelligence before deciding on any strategic moves. The smart strategist should never presume anything.
Those three grand points are some essential points behind our Compass AE process. We will present a specific test case that encompasses those three mentioned points in our future book.

Summary
Have you ever thought that your interpretation of quality information could be the reason behind the current state of your business?

Copyright: 2011 © Compass360 Consulting Group (C360)
Copying, posting and reproduction in any form (without prior consent) is an infringement of copyright.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

The Dao of Strategy: Making Decisions (3)

Occasionally, some people based their decisions on their immediate emotional needs and wants. They usually think about the benefits of the current moment, not about the future-based consequences. In summary, They rarely think beyond their situation.

Taking time to understand the tangibility of their big picture would have enable them to make better decisions in their personal life and in their business.

We at Compass360 Consulting Group believes in the grand strategic action of understanding the big picture before deciding on anything is the key. ... How do you make your decision?

Click here for an interesting article on why many people cannot make decisions.

Our interpretation of the Chinese strategy classics tells us that understanding the settings (in details) determines when to think in black and white and when to understand the level of grayness.
... One typical step of our Compass AE strategic decision process is to prioritizes the core values first. Then,
determining what are the risk rewards and risk consequences.
how it can be affected at a later time frame.

Friday, November 19, 2010

The Abstract Behind The Compass Decision (1)

We have occasionally met with chief decision makers of all sorts and discussed about the different matters regarding to their views of what strategy is about. During the course of our conversation, we asked them about their strategic decision-making process . Some of them have told us that they have a tendency to implement their strategy regardless of the circumstances. They are rarely process-driven and feel that the concept of "assessing the big picture before acting" takes too long and that it is technically irrelevant. The only thing that counts is their ability to make things happen and lead their team to capitalist glory.

The Flaw Behind Their Strategic Decision Management Process
Due to a lack of complete information, they do not understand whether the grand situation is stable or chaotic. Their absolute focus is to understand of the immediate risk/rewards, not the risk consequences that are derived from the outcome of their decisions. .

A breakdown of different strategic decision-making styles


Regardless of their style of decision-making, we usually emphasized to them the importance of increasing their understanding of the big tangible picture before implementing any strategic moves. Conclusively, it usually leads to a better decision.

Following is a list of questions that might provoke some thoughts:

  • What is your view of the big picture?
  • How do you use it to your advantage?
  • What is your process to transform your assessment to a tangible plan?
We will further touch on this topic at a later post.

side note: We will discuss the matter of "when to make contingency moves" in our future book.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Strategic Decisions Without Borders (5)


We have always noticed that some of the so-called motivational-driven leaders have a tendency of focusing on inspirational speeches and their own (petty) causes. They rarely ever focus on the larger picture.
Whenever they ever focus on a challenge, their solution is quite abstract, idealistic, vague and intangible.

These leaders are idealists who usually have not spend anytime assessing the big tangible picture. Regardless of the reasons, their decisions are usually political-driven, limited in scope and intangible in most cases.

The big picture of these non-strategic leaders is usually quite limited. In most cases, he or she does not have the "real" capability to make a sound strategic decision in five min. or less. They do not possess the aptitude and the attitude to either evolve and let the professionals do their job. ... He/she occasionally do not know the way of trusting. .It ultimately lead them to fail in the task of delegating. ...

In spite of the situation, are they willing to to put their reputation on the line if their decisions are wrong?


The Dao of The Strategist
The "true" strategy professional looks at "strategy" as one thing and many things. He or she observes the big picture from different angles and knows the various attributes that are involved (i.e., the time line, the spacing, the resources, etc.) . In general, the strategist
gets the most out of the situation by knowing the full scope of the big picture. What is meant by the full scope is the advantages and disadvantages of the specifics behind the big picture.

This strategist only makes decisions when he/she knows the state of their informational picture.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Strategic Decisions Without Borders (4)


Following is another view on making strategic decisions:

The following article makes a significant point on strategic decisions.

Compass360 Consulting believes that knowing the rules are ok. Knowing the state of predictability within the "Big Tangible Picture" is the key to knowing when a specific rule is valid

#
October 22, 2006
Digital Domain
It's Not the People You Know. It's Where You Are.
By RANDALL STROSS

FIBER networks cross the world. Data bits move at light speed. The globe has been flattened, and national boundaries obliterated. Yet in Silicon Valley, the one place that is responsible more than any other for creating the network technology that supposedly renders geography irrelevant, physical distance is very much on the minds of the investors who provide venture capital.


Meet the "20-minute rule" that guides fateful decisions in Silicon Valley. Craig Johnson, managing director of Concept2Company Ventures , a venture capital firm in Palo Alto, Calif., who has 30 years of experience in early-stage financings, said he knew many venture capitalists who adhered to this doctrine: if a start-up company seeking venture capital is not within a 20-minute drive of the venture firm's offices, it will not be funded.

Mr. Johnson explained that close proximity permits the investor to provide in-person guidance; initially, that may entail many meetings each week before investor and entrepreneur come to know each other well enough to rely mostly on the phone for updates. Those initial interactions are fateful. "Starting a company is like launching a rocket," Mr. Johnson said. "If you're a tenth of a degree off at launch, you may be 1,000 miles off downrange."

Capital and attention are lavished on entrepreneurs in the Valley as in no other place. Ten years ago, when Dow Jones VentureOne began a quarterly survey of where venture investments landed, one-third of all deals in the country went to the San Francisco Bay Area. Since then, the same share of deals has gone to the same place, almost without variation. Most recently, in the first six months of this year, Silicon Valley still pulled in 32 percent; the region with the second-largest total, New England, was far behind, at 10 percent.

The latest wave of innovation, embodied in Web 2.0 companies, is centered in Silicon Valley. Joshua Grove, a research analyst at VentureOne, said that 43 percent of Web 2.0 deals this year were in the Bay Area, the formal category for the Valley. These included three of the four largest financings: the $25 million that went to Facebook, $14.5 million to Zimbra and $12 million to Six Apart.

How well is the Valley doing in incubating this newest crop of start-ups? Ask the investors at YouTube, who are celebrating Google's $1.65 billion deal for a company that was all of 19 months old. Or look at Google's own record of growth: building a market capitalization of $141 billion in only eight years.

YouTube and Google share the same source of venture financing: Sequoia Capital, situated among the venture capital firms clustered in a handful of blocks in office parks along Sand Hill Road in Menlo Park, near the Stanford campus. Google's other source of venture capital, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, is nearby, too.

Why so many of these firms, which form the world's most concentrated source of capital for new ventures, originally collected in that particular spot, rather than, say, outside the Massachusetts Institute of Technology or the California Institute of Technology, is not important; what is important is that this is where they happen to be today.

Sequoia makes its preference for the 20-minute rule almost explicit, telling applicants whose companies are at the "seed stage" (receiving less than $1 million) or "early stage" ($1 million to $10 million) that "it is helpful if the company is close to our offices" because they "require very frequent contact."

Kleiner Perkins has only one office, the one in Menlo Park. Sequoia has reached out to entrepreneurs more considerately, providing five offices. But only one of the five, the one in Menlo Park, is in the United States. The others are in China (two), India and Israel.

If you have a brilliant idea for the New New Thing and want Sequoia to provide its funds and blessing — using the same golden touch provided not long ago to Google's founders — you would be much better off in Beijing, where Sequoia has an office, than in Boston, where it does not.

It's convenient for venture capitalists to have entrepreneurs close by, but the reverse is true, too, said Allen Morgan, a managing director of the Mayfield Fund, which manages $2.3 billion in venture capital and is also on Sand Hill Road. Mr. Morgan made the case by pointing out that a prospective entrepreneur would, on average, need to have three to eight meetings with a venture fund before he or she was successful, but would have to go through a similar process with 5 to 10 firms before finding the one that approved the funding request.

Even if the process goes smoothly and requires only 15 meetings — the fewest possible, given the lowest range of possibilities — and even if most of those meetings are set up in advance, the time consumed in getting to Sand Hill Road, even using local highways, can be significant. The problem is that much worse when, as often happens, a meeting is called with just an hour or two of notice. "If you live in Santa Clara, it's doable," Mr. Morgan said. "If you live in Dubuque, it's not."

Entrepreneurs who live in Silicon Valley also find the technical talent they need faster than they can in any other place; they pay more for that talent, but speed is the sine qua non for success. Seth J. Sternberg, the chief executive of Meebo, an instant-messaging company in Palo Alto that is backed by Sequoia, described Silicon Valley with the fervent appreciation of a recent transplant from New York, where he had suffered three separate bad experiences with start-ups, none of which had attracted venture funding.

The ecosystem in Silicon Valley, Mr. Sternberg said, includes "incredible techies, who live here because this is the epicenter, where they can find the most interesting projects to work on." The ecosystem also includes real estate agents, accountants, head hunters and lawyers who understand an entrepreneur's situation — that is, emptied bank accounts and maxed-out credit cards.

"In New York, it would be extremely difficult to find a law firm willing to defer the first $20,000 of your legal fees," Mr. Sternberg said. "Here, we got that. It's a pretty standard thing in Silicon Valley."

On the East Coast, a business plan contest at the Harvard Business School in 2004 prompted one M.B.A. graduate, Arijit Sengupta, to found BeyondCore, a software company, in his apartment in Boston. Mr. Sengupta, who earlier had earned a bachelor's degree in computer science and economics at Stanford, was determined to develop a finished product and to acquire customers by the oldest method of all: bootstrapping, or starting a business without outside capital.

He did end up needing Silicon Valley for something else: technical talent that would be willing to accept equity in place of any salary. Six weeks ago, he moved to Silicon Valley to recruit more people like his chief technical officer, who has been working full time since Jan. 1 for equity only.

"Elsewhere, if people in a large organization think you have potential, they offer you a job, trying to save you from the uncertainties of a start-up," said Mr. Sengupta, who himself has worked at Oracle, Microsoft and General Motors. "In Silicon Valley, they say, 'Can I join you?' "

Mr. Sengupta now has six "employees" working for BeyondCore without salaries. Only in Silicon Valley, he said, do "people have confidence that if you act on great ideas, the money will come."

  • Rule of Global Capitalism: People only follow successful endeavors. They usually support "perceived" winners.

Predictions of the Valley's demise have become a perennial, said Mr. Morgan, the Mayfield venture capitalist. "Every five years, Time or Newsweek runs a story: 'Silicon Valley is Dead,' " he said. "But Silicon Valley is bigger and more vibrant and better at creating companies than it has ever been."

Silicon Valley is not "bigger" in a literal sense. In fact, it remains geographically contained by the Santa Cruz Mountains on one side and San Francisco Bay on the other. The physical features of the place help explain the Valley's vitality.

MR. JOHNSON, the venture capitalist in Palo Alto, noted that the greater Los Angeles area also has a pool of talented engineers (working at aerospace companies like Lockheed, Northrop and Hughes) and great universities (notably Caltech and U.C.L.A.) and plenty of money to invest. "But in Los Angeles," he said, "people are scattered across a wide area; everything is more spread out."

It's harder for entrepreneurs to meet with one another and with investors, he added. And that means connections take longer, deals move slowly, fewer companies are formed. "Like a gas, entrepreneurship is hotter when compressed." he said.

Why, one might ask, must relationships be built only by physical presence? Why, if the phone does not serve well, cannot the newest generation of videoconferencing gear — which provides stunning video to accompany sound — save the various participants from the vexations of getting together in person?

Mr. Morgan of Mayfield scoffed at the suggestion of virtual meetings as a feasible medium of establishing trust in business. He said that if the matter were important — and human beings were involved — he believed that there would never, ever be a replacement for face-to-face meetings.

  • Compass Rule: Regardless of the distance, trust is the first step toward any relevant cooperation.

Randall Stross is an author based in Silicon Valley and a professor of business at San Jose State University. E-mail: digitaldomain@nytimes.com.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/22/business/yourmoney/22digi.html